In the year 1819 many
things had happened that strengthened the United States. A strong sense of
nationalism had overcome many Americans because of the expansions that were
taking place during this time. This was the “Era of Good Feelings”, but that
doesn’t mean that hardships weren’t faced during this time. Risks had to be
taken to achieve goals. As stated, “High risk, high reward”, which is what was
shown during this time period with Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams. Spain
had control of Florida, but their reign had been declining quickly for a good
while. In 1816 some escaped slaves had taken control of a British fort in
Florida and rebelled against some U.S. soldiers. This was near some Seminole
Indians that perceived this as hostile and started to attack some white
settlements. Andrew Jackson was a General at this point and time and he
promised President Monroe that they could take control of Florida within 60
days. The President didn’t approve this action, but Andrew Jackson continued
with this plan regardless. The point of this was to capture the Seminole
Indians that had attacked the white settlements and fled into Florida to escape
prosecution. Under the leadership of Andrew Jackson, Soldiers attacked a
Spanish fort and captured two Seminole Indian chiefs. Two British traders were
accused of provoking the Indians to attack the settlements. The General soon
captured West Florida and planted the American government. Americans that
wanted to expand were excited, but on the other hand there was a very angry
Spain. Florida was demanded to be given back by Spain. This was not taken a
threat because the U.S. saw that Spain didn’t have the power to go up against
them as a nation. Jackson was punished, but was not taken down from command.
Jackson had taken a high risk with invading Spanish territory, but in the end
expanded the nation as a whole, improved nationalism, and showed off the
military power to foreign countries. That leaves you with the question, could
there have been an easier way to take over Florida? Or maybe this was the
easiest way. In any case, good feeling were spreading over the country like a
disease and one man saw an opportunity of a lifetime to keep those feelings
alive. His name was John Quincy Adams who was Secretary of State and he was
good friends with Andrew Jackson. Spanish bought the territory back from the
U.S. knowing that it could be taken back at any time. Adams negotiated with
Spain for the Louisiana Purchase. The goal was the Texas border, but it was a
bit much so Adams settled for Louisiana. He was determined and adamant about
claiming this territory. In 1819 Adams was able to convince Spain to sign the
Adams-Onis treaty and allow the U.S. to completely take Florida. Final
Ratifications of were made in 1821 for Florida and its first governor was
selected, Andrew Jackson. By 1845 Florida would officially become a state on
the map. These men took great risks and achieved something great for not only
themselves, but a whole nation for years to come. This shows the high risk and
high reward theory. This theory is shown in today’s modern age especially with
businesses. It kind of goes along with the American Dream, so maybe gives someone
the feeling of American Spirit! People may take this for granted today, but the
USA could be different without Florida. Later on Andrew Jackson became
President, but would he have if he never took over Florida? There’s many what
if’s, but the fact of the matter is what happened is done and everyone should
remember those good feelings. These feelings weren’t achieved by a single man,
but many men. This situation showed people in the future that by working
together, many great things may be achieved. With this I leave you, Do you
think that Jackson’s plan was an important factor in history?
An Era of "Good Feelings"
Monday, November 4, 2013
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Relations With Britain
The War of 1812, known as Americas "second war of independence," was ended by the Treaty of Ghent, being a peace Treaty. It was not all peace though, as their were disputes created from it. Other treaties had to come along and take care of the problems.
The Rush-Bagot Agreement of 1817 and the Convention of 1818 had reduced those causes of irritation. What do I mean by irritation? What was irritated?
Well, for one there was a threat of naval competition on the Great Lakes. Limiting the forces there, had eliminated this threat. Even though not stated, it can be interpreted why this is so. Naval competition occurs from groups of troops and soldiers and armies and forces coming together versus another side. As one side grows, the other side feels threatened so they feel the need to advance too and this continues and soon, chaos could occur. This was stopped before that point by reducing the forces of men on the Great Lakes and going back to more of a peaceful stand point.
From the Convention of 1818, pretty much overall if created joint occupancy of Oregon, West of the Rocky mountain between Britain and America. It allowed them to establish settlements. Another "irritation" was visible here as britain was excluding American ships from the West Indies to save the trade for them. they were being what we would describe as selfish and greedy. If this had not been resolved and taken care of it could have led to further downfall for trade in America. Trade may not have advanced after a certain point of decline and the country itself would lose power, if no major trade could happen which is still what helps us hold power today. It was in 1820 that Monroe that gave us an act of total "nonintercourse," which gave flaw to Britain to allow America to hole their standing with the trade too.
The Rush-Bagot Agreement of 1817 and the Convention of 1818 had reduced those causes of irritation. What do I mean by irritation? What was irritated?
Well, for one there was a threat of naval competition on the Great Lakes. Limiting the forces there, had eliminated this threat. Even though not stated, it can be interpreted why this is so. Naval competition occurs from groups of troops and soldiers and armies and forces coming together versus another side. As one side grows, the other side feels threatened so they feel the need to advance too and this continues and soon, chaos could occur. This was stopped before that point by reducing the forces of men on the Great Lakes and going back to more of a peaceful stand point.
From the Convention of 1818, pretty much overall if created joint occupancy of Oregon, West of the Rocky mountain between Britain and America. It allowed them to establish settlements. Another "irritation" was visible here as britain was excluding American ships from the West Indies to save the trade for them. they were being what we would describe as selfish and greedy. If this had not been resolved and taken care of it could have led to further downfall for trade in America. Trade may not have advanced after a certain point of decline and the country itself would lose power, if no major trade could happen which is still what helps us hold power today. It was in 1820 that Monroe that gave us an act of total "nonintercourse," which gave flaw to Britain to allow America to hole their standing with the trade too.
James Monroe
James Monroe had entered presidency in 1817. He was known for some of his failures at first then led into the Bang of what we are today. He did not continue to influence and build on with "new nationalism." If you are not aware of what the term is, New nationalism is referring to government protection of human welfare and property rights. Some argues one was more significant then the other. For example of Monroe not helping to advance forward with these ways, during the permission of the National Road to be extended, Monroe did not allow tolls to be collected for the repair and maintenance.
It was during Monroe's time, that the historic term "Era of Good Feelings," had come into play. It was first used to describe his presidency in a newspaper, and later was used to describe the period as a whole. Just from the title itself, someone now a days can get good connotation from it and assume it was positive uphill matters. during the era. "Good Feelings," sounds promising. This is exactly what is assumed. There were not major conflicts between political parties and it was a time to attempt unity among Americans and find the nation a purpose for people to lead with.
This seems to hold a strong foundations for America today.
This allows you to visualize James Monroe and what came about during his presidency.
It was during Monroe's time, that the historic term "Era of Good Feelings," had come into play. It was first used to describe his presidency in a newspaper, and later was used to describe the period as a whole. Just from the title itself, someone now a days can get good connotation from it and assume it was positive uphill matters. during the era. "Good Feelings," sounds promising. This is exactly what is assumed. There were not major conflicts between political parties and it was a time to attempt unity among Americans and find the nation a purpose for people to lead with.
This seems to hold a strong foundations for America today.
America no longer believed they are to be ruled under royalty and should owe their freedom to no one but themselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)